[Scope] Real-time multi-researcher co-editing #133
Labels
No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
future
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
rbrooks/TeaLeaves#133
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Scope-expanding idea - PARKED, needs a product decision (Fable ideation) · Category: architecture/scope
Pitch
Live, simultaneous multi-user editing of entries/motifs within a project (shared cursors, real-time merge), beyond today's invite-based collaboration.
What it would add
project_collaborators(migration 028) already models shared access, and v7 added signed cross-instance editing - but both are asynchronous. Live co-editing would need CRDT/OT conflict resolution and a persistent websocket layer, a runtime shape the app deliberately avoids (short BullMQ jobs, request/response).Why it redefines scope
The spec's first identity statement is "a personal research tool" for one researcher. Real-time co-editing inverts that into a collaborative multiplayer app, with the attendant presence/permissions/merge infrastructure and a fundamentally different operational profile (long-lived stateful connections - see also the v9 streaming prerequisite, #117).
The honest case for
If the "help others start building their own research" thread (spec v2 collaborative access) grows into genuine joint projects, live editing is the natural endpoint.
The honest case against (recommended default)
The existing async collaboration (share links, editor invites, v7 signed remote edits with a conflict-review queue) already supports multiple contributors without the CRDT/websocket burden. Last-write-wins + conflict review is a reasonable ceiling for a research tool; real-time is a large investment against the single-researcher identity.
Decision needed
From the 2026-07-15 codebase audit - Fable feature-ideation pass. Companion report:
docs/.internal/report-2026-07-15.md(gitignored).